RESUMO
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of primary sternal closure technique compared to vacuum-assisted closure technique in treatment of post-cardiac surgery mediastinitis in paediatric age group. Additionally, assessed postoperative need for IV drug use, hospital stay length, wound and sternal healing and survival. Hypotheses: primary sternal closure is a reliable technique for treatment of poststernotomy mediastinitis following cardiac surgery in paediatric age group. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial included 217 pediatric patients developed post-cardiac surgery mediastinitis from 2016 to 2022. They were randomly divided into primary sternal closure group (A) and vacuum-assisted closure group (B) and operated by two cardiothoracic surgeons. Follow-up of the patients was done for 6-months duration following treatment of mediastinitis to assess postoperative need for hospitalization, IV drug use, wound complications, sternal stability and survival. Results: The final analysis included 101 patients in each group. The chance of survival over 6 months after surgery was more for primary sternal closure group (175.2) days versus (157.6) days for the vacuum-assisted closure group, with significant difference Log Rank test p-value (0.005). Duration for IV antibiotics use in the primary closure group was 8.55±3.57 and it was 32.61±8.39 showing high statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Patients in the primary closure group had earlier discharge from hospital 15.77±4.18 than vacuum assisted group 42.61±8.39, with high statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Primary closure group showed better sternal stability and sternotomy wound healing on clinical follow-up. Conclusion: Primary sternal closure technique is a favorable technique over vacuum-assisted closure technique for treatment of paediatric mediastinitis following cardiac surgery. The reinforced sternal closure technique is a reliable technique with promising results regarding IV drugs need, hospitalization duration, survival and sternotomy wound healing.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess vancomycin paste effect on poststernotomy healing in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients compared to bone wax using the 6-point computed tomography (CT) score. Additionally assessed the reliability of this score and its relationship to the occurrence of infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective comparative analysis included 126 high-risk CABG patients. The patients were randomly assigned into bone wax or vancomycin paste for sternal haemostasis. All patients were submitted to CT examinations 6-months postoperative. Two radiologists independently reviewed all CT scans to assess sternal healing using the 6-point CT score. The CT healing score of the two groups was compared. The kappa statistics were used to calculate the inter-reader agreement (IRA) of the 6-point CT score. RESULTS: The final analysis included 61 patients in each group. The main CT score for sternal healing was 3.9±0.4 in the vancomycin group and 3.3±0.8 in the bone wax group. Patients in the vancomycin group had a higher statistically significant improvement in CT healing score than those in the bone wax group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship (p = 0.79) between the occurrence of infection and the 6-point CT score in the vancomycin group. The overall IRA of the 6-point CT score was good in two groups (κ = 0.79 in the vancomycin group and = 0.78 in the bone wax group). CONCLUSION: Vancomycin paste had a better CT healing score and can be used as a sternal haemostatic material instead of bone wax. The 6-point CT healing score is a reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating sternal healing.
